The firm has been in existence for 10 years, so it should show 5 years of perfomance. And on top of that the two additional years of GIPS compliance. Hence 5+1+1 = 7
The firm has been in existence for 10 years, so it should show 5 years of perfomance. And on top of that the two additional years of GIPS compliance.
Hence 5+1+1 = 7
Gips – the answer should be 10 right?
The firm has been in existence for 10 years, so it should show 5 years of perfomance. And on top of that the two additional years of GIPS compliance. Hence 5+1+1 = 7
The firm has been in existence for 10 years, so it should show 5 years of perfomance. And on top of that the two additional years of GIPS compliance.
See lessHence 5+1+1 = 7
Collusion is similar to cartel formation. If this is true, shouldn’t companies with similar mrket share have an edge amd there should be more likelihood of a collusion happening?
So, after forming the cartel, they didnt respect the rpterms of the cartel. So collusion is less likely?
So, after forming the cartel, they didnt respect the rpterms of the cartel. So collusion is less likely?
See less