PFA Case Study 2 of Sanjay Sir’s In-House Case Study Series.
CA Final RM– In-House Case Study Series by Sanjay Saraf Sir–Case2 Question
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Case Study 2 Solutions of In-House Case Study Series by Sanjay Saraf Sir.
CA Final RM– In-House Case Study Series by Sanjay Saraf Sir–Case2 Solution
for Item 1 can we say this is reduction? Co is mitigating risk by taking care of customers designing product as per need so taking good care of customer is kind of NOT AVOIDING and REDUCING
For Item 5 can we say Ultimately agar production Increase nehi hua toh loss co ko hi hoga so its ACCEPING RISK???
For Item 1, management responded ”no further action is deemed necessary at this time” and they did nothing as nothing is mentioned under response head. So i guess we can’t write reduction here.
For item 5, filling the head ”Management Risk Response” is all about what company did and not what is the result of its action. The company has done some rotation process as mentioned in Exhibit 2. So we can’t write Accepting the risk as it means we did nothing. Risk reduction better suits it.