In q 16; why C will not be the ans? As we read that property rights must be strong & here as brazil is emerging market nation to waise hi usme property rights utna jada strong nahi hoga & aur simplify karne se usko; kya usse LTEG fall nahi hoga? I understood why A is the ans but why C will not be the ans; that’s my question.
Share
Acc to my view:
clarifying the property rights means asan langugage me properties rights bta diya (koi kaise rent pe lega, kaise sell / buy karna hai, govt. office ki formalaties reduce kar di ), jisse conflict between the parties nhi honge if foreign investor comes to brazil to invest he can easily understood the properties rights so he can buy the property here and make a business and develop the brazil
I hope you will get Know!
I did not got you. Ye rent, buy/sell of the property kaha se aa gya? Yaha copyright, patent un sab ka bat ho rha hai.
yaha pe basically maine ye kahane chaha jo aapne likha ki aapne likha ki simplfy property rights karne se kya hoga uska matlab kya hota hai in reality me thoda elaborately bolna chaha (basically eg dia hai)
acc to ur query ki property rights ko simplify karne se brazil ke lteg pe kya farak padega .
I think u r understood wrong way the meaning of simplfy vs strong if any thing which clarify / simplfy something it is good signal so it increase the LTEG
I hope u will get it know!
So here simplifying doesn’t mean reducing?
yes, simplify – just make thing easier to understand
Ok thank you