In Q.36 we are computing EAC and in Q.37, we are using NPV, reason being it is not a repetitive process. Isn’t Q36, also a one time thing? Shouldn’t we have used NPV?
(I want to know conceptually, not what ICAI provides as solution)
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In project evaluation and financial analysis, both Net Present Value (NPV) and Estimate at Completion (EAC) are important tools, but they serve different purposes and are applied in different contexts. Let’s break down their conceptual differences to understand why EAC is used in Q.36 and NPV in Q.37:
So, conceptually, the choice between EAC and NPV depends on the context and what you are trying to assess:
In summary, the choice between EAC and NPV depends on whether you are concerned with project cost estimation (EAC) or long-term profitability analysis (NPV), and this determines their applicability in different scenarios.