(1.6-0.5) *0.03*6.5 =0.2145 (1.6-0.75) *0.27*6.5=1.49175 (1.6-1.2) *4.6*6.5=11.96 (1.6-2.8) *9.1*6.5= -70. 98 Total of above= -57. 31 Then I divided it by 100 so I got , -0. 5731
(1.6-0.5) *0.03*6.5 =0.2145
(1.6-0.75) *0.27*6.5=1.49175
(1.6-1.2) *4.6*6.5=11.96
(1.6-2.8) *9.1*6.5= -70. 98
Total of above= -57. 31
Then I divided it by 100 so I got , -0. 5731
So in the above question committed capital is not= 185 then how did the calculation of carried interest in the first year make use of 185 . My doubt is in the year 2013 how did we get 0.1 as carried interest because question doesnt meantion 185 as committer capital.
So in the above question committed capital is not= 185 then how did the calculation of carried interest in the first year make use of 185 .
My doubt is in the year 2013 how did we get 0.1 as carried interest because question doesnt meantion 185 as committer capital.
So do we calculate carried interest on the basis of ''paid in capital" or "committed" capital. Can you tell what is the formula. According to me formula for carried interest is = Rate%(Nav before distribution- committed capital). Please correct me if my understanding the formula is not right.
So do we calculate carried interest on the basis of ”paid in capital” or “committed” capital. Can you tell what is the formula. According to me formula for carried interest is = Rate%(Nav before distribution- committed capital). Please correct me if my understanding the formula is not right.
Fixed income
Thanks
Thanks
See lessFixed income
(1.6-0.5) *0.03*6.5 =0.2145 (1.6-0.75) *0.27*6.5=1.49175 (1.6-1.2) *4.6*6.5=11.96 (1.6-2.8) *9.1*6.5= -70. 98 Total of above= -57. 31 Then I divided it by 100 so I got , -0. 5731
(1.6-0.5) *0.03*6.5 =0.2145
See less(1.6-0.75) *0.27*6.5=1.49175
(1.6-1.2) *4.6*6.5=11.96
(1.6-2.8) *9.1*6.5= -70. 98
Total of above= -57. 31
Then I divided it by 100 so I got , -0. 5731
Doubt from candidate resource
So in the above question committed capital is not= 185 then how did the calculation of carried interest in the first year make use of 185 . My doubt is in the year 2013 how did we get 0.1 as carried interest because question doesnt meantion 185 as committer capital.
So in the above question committed capital is not= 185 then how did the calculation of carried interest in the first year make use of 185 .
See lessMy doubt is in the year 2013 how did we get 0.1 as carried interest because question doesnt meantion 185 as committer capital.
Doubt from candidate resource
So do we calculate carried interest on the basis of ''paid in capital" or "committed" capital. Can you tell what is the formula. According to me formula for carried interest is = Rate%(Nav before distribution- committed capital). Please correct me if my understanding the formula is not right.
So do we calculate carried interest on the basis of ”paid in capital” or “committed” capital. Can you tell what is the formula. According to me formula for carried interest is = Rate%(Nav before distribution- committed capital). Please correct me if my understanding the formula is not right.
See lessDoubt from candidate resource
Yes Just wanted to know how in the year 2013 Carried interest came to 0.1. Thanks
Yes
Just wanted to know how in the year 2013
Carried interest came to 0.1.
Thanks
See lessFra – multinational operations
FRA DOUBT Sent above.
FRA DOUBT Sent above.
See lessPricing and valuation of equity swap
Sent the question i.e write up of example 19 along with solution.
Sent the question i.e write up of example 19 along with solution.
See less