Can you give rationale behind incorrectness of both the conclusions
Share
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
For conclusion number one it’s saying that assuming the demand for the grains is constant we are talking about extreme heat extreme heat may or may not be good for the grains if we look about extreme heat we may see that to grow grains moderate level of heat is required here we are talking about extreme heat maybe due to extreme heat the few amount of grains went bad that is the supply reduced and the demand is constant so what will happen is the price will actually increase and we won’t be benefited it will be a loss to us because we are importing it.
In conclusion to new tires on cattle introduced in our primary export market we are exporting the cattle so why will it affect the local price of the cattle is it will affect the exporting price of the cattle is it won’t be costlier in our country it will be costlier for the countries were importing it from us so therefore the conclusion is incorrect.